Fugitivus Discussion Forum

It is currently Wed May 22, 2013 7:26 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Post-coital revocation of consent. *Triggers* Rape
PostPosted: Thu Aug 19, 2010 5:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 17, 2010 3:28 pm
Posts: 22
Hey everyone. I thought I had run through all the stupid questions that I could ask about rape. However I manage to find a new one.

*Trigger warnings for rape and emotional manipulation are in effect for this thread.*

As some of you may know I frequent another board (or two) around the net. On one of these I found this:
Spoiler: show
Quote:
Quote:
As another minor point, I find it a bit puzzling how you can find it offensive, when I say that if he does not know her true feelings, but is instead deceived into thinking that her feelings are something different, then he can't be expected to take care of her true feelings. This one is purely logical, as long as we assume no mindreading, as we can only act on how the world is presented to us.


My response is a bit complicated and might be difficult to understand since it's based on my experiences.

The last few times I was raped were from very strong emotional and intellectual compulsion. At the time, I felt pretty convinced that I knew what decisions I was making. It wasn't until the "friendship" ended that I was able to look back and see that the guy had taken advantage of my emotional state. I don't think his desire was to rape me, but rather to get what he wanted by convincing me that I wanted the same thing.

So for someone like you who wants to be really sure that she's giving consent and is considering nonverbal cues and all that, your quoted statement is fine. But there's other people who are selfish jerks, and I wouldn't want them using that statement to justify taking advantage of someone else. It's their pouncing that I'm afraid of.


The post indicates a belief that consent can be revoked after the fact and thus designate the actions rape even with at the time consent. I'm not very comfortable with this. I presume that it is the emotional manipulation that is the factor in the revocation of consent after the fact being valid? Is it analogous to mind control (mind controlled sex = rape seems logical to me because it prevents all possibility of non consent)? Does reduced capacity have something to do with it (analogous to minors and the seriously mentally ill)?

Basically, I feel like saying "you weren't raped. You intentionally, truthfully, voluntarily consented. You could call the douche a douche but he didn't commit rape." I recognize this as a likely piece of asshaberdashery on my part (because of the shape) and would like discussion/education to either validate or (more likely) correct my view.

_________________
harrietj wrote:
In fact, I am positively hermitical (fun note: this both means as pertaining to a hermit, and a spiced cookie. Om nom nom solitude!).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Post-coital revocation of consent. *Triggers* Rape
PostPosted: Thu Aug 19, 2010 7:18 pm 
The only thing I can think of is if the person thinks it was rape, it was, or at least it had the same emotional effect of rape on them.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Post-coital revocation of consent. *Triggers* Rape
PostPosted: Thu Aug 19, 2010 8:43 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 6:04 am
Posts: 258
Quote:
Basically, I feel like saying "you weren't raped. You intentionally, truthfully, voluntarily consented. You could call the douche a douche but he didn't commit rape."


Okay, so preface of my experience goes something like this:

Spoiler: show
I had an ex who was manipulative. In the particular instance I'm remembering, he coaxed/cajoled/coerced me into performing oral sex, by asking over and over again until I stopped saying "no" and finally said "okay." I never felt good about that experience. I was terrified that his roommate would walk into the room, or that someone would somehow see through the window and blinds. I didn't really want to do it, but I couldn't come up with any good reason *not* to, other than reasons that I thought just meant I was a scaredy-cat/prude.


So. Did I consent, in that situation? Technically I agreed to the sex. Was the consent enthusiastic? Was it freely given? Hell no (I wasn't forced, physically, but manipulation is, in my opinion, a form of emotional "forcing" that can be just as difficult to resist). So is that rape? I think if one is being *extremely* technical, then no, it was not. But it sure as heck didn't feel right.

All by way of saying I think that we often hesitate to use the term rape because it has been pushed further and further back into the "very serious, don't accuse lightly" realm by apologists. But I think if one rejects the taboo-ness of the word, then it is possible to apply it to any occasion on which there is a lack of enthusiastic consent, without diminishing the "super bad" sort of rape-esque experiences. Just because someone got someone else to give a "technical" consent doesn't mean manipulation wasn't used in the process. And I think the use of manipulation colors the consent to something more approaching non-consent.

So I have no idea anymore if I've addressed the question you were getting at, Kulantan... I'd like to discuss in more detail, though, and hopefully clarify some of my rambling.

Edited to add: I would like to clarify that I did not identify this encounter as anything even approaching a form of assault until a long time after it happened. Had you asked me, at the time, if I consented, I would have said yes. But now I am not so sure, and so perhaps this is a form of after-the-fact consent-revocation.

_________________
It is morally as bad not to care whether a thing is true or not, so long as it makes you feel good, as it is not to care how you got your money as long as you have got it.

-Edmund Way Teale


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Post-coital revocation of consent. *Triggers* Rape
PostPosted: Thu Aug 19, 2010 9:30 pm 
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 3:28 am
Posts: 534
Location: Edge of the Everglades
I hear you on this one. I was pressured into sex by a real douchebag who took advantage of me when I was very, very vulnerable. *non consensual sex trigger warning*

Spoiler: show
I was kicked out of my house in high school,my boyfriend had left for college, and I had no car. He invited me over. I thought he liked me as a person. He just wanted to have sex with me. I cried and said no. So, he waited, pretended to listen to my problems, and busted a move again about 15 minutes later. I cried and said no. He waited again, and the next time he busted a move I finally gave in. Now that I look back, it was not consent. But, I stopped saying no.


Was it rape? It sure as hell wasn't consent. I don't really self identify as a sexual assault victim, but I do think it was non consensual sex. I sometimes call it "gray rape" to myself, but I know many people have a problem with that term.

I think it is OK for us in this setting to talk about the nuance in non-consensual sex. But, in the larger context, rape, sexual assault, and nonconsensual sex are more likely to be blamed on the victim and downplayed than trumped up, so I feel guilty adding to that by downplaying my own nonconsensual sex experience.

I really don't have anything to say about the "after the fact" example. I don't know the specifics, and I allow people to define their own experiences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Post-coital revocation of consent. *Triggers* Rape
PostPosted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 2:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 3:18 am
Posts: 262
If I consent to sex when I'm in a blackout drunk state, it's still rape.
If I consent to sex when I'm told I'll be evicted if I don't, it's still rape.
If I consent to sex when you've been pestering me for 2 hours and you won't shut up and get your hands off me, it's still rape.
If I consent to sex when I'm told you won't leave the apartment until after we have sex, it's still rape.

What we need more focus on is enthusiastic consent, given freely and without coercion. Anything less than that is still rape, unless the victim chooses to call it something else.

_________________
"THEY WILL TELL YOU NO, a thousand times no, until all the no's become meaningless. All your life they will tell you no, quite firmly and very quickly. AND YOU WILL TELL THEM YES."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Post-coital revocation of consent. *Triggers* Rape
PostPosted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 2:20 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 6:04 am
Posts: 258
Hear, hear, Karalyn!

_________________
It is morally as bad not to care whether a thing is true or not, so long as it makes you feel good, as it is not to care how you got your money as long as you have got it.

-Edmund Way Teale


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Post-coital revocation of consent. *Triggers* Rape
PostPosted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 4:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 22, 2010 11:01 am
Posts: 135
Location: Saint Petersburg, FL
Karalyn wrote:
If I consent to sex when I'm in a blackout drunk state, it's still rape.
If I consent to sex when I'm told I'll be evicted if I don't, it's still rape.
If I consent to sex when you've been pestering me for 2 hours and you won't shut up and get your hands off me, it's still rape.
If I consent to sex when I'm told you won't leave the apartment until after we have sex, it's still rape.

What we need more focus on is enthusiastic consent, given freely and without coercion. Anything less than that is still rape, unless the victim chooses to call it something else.


Yesss. Thank you for that third one especially; I need to hear that one every once in a while. And I want to add a few more specific ones, which I'm putting under a spoiler tag just in case.

Spoiler: show
If I consent to sex when you're looming over me in a position that keeps me cornered, claustrophobic and compromised, it's still rape. Threats don't have to be verbal.
If I consent to sex after being insulted, degraded, harassed etc in private or public for repeatedly saying no, it's still rape.
If I consent to sex because "you'll say yes if you really love me, and maybe we should just break up if you won't" gets thrown in my face in response to a minute/hour/week/month/year of me saying "no", it's still rape.


I'd share my experiences with manipulated, unenthusiastic consent more clearly, but while I can handle reading other people's stories I can't handle writing mine right now. I haven't even quite been able to touch it on my blog yet; I keep beating around the bush. :/

_________________
Et la mer avait embrassé moi
Et la délivré moi de ma caille


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Post-coital revocation of consent. *Triggers* Rape
PostPosted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 3:18 am
Posts: 262
Kulantan wrote:
Basically, I feel like saying "you weren't raped. You intentionally, truthfully, voluntarily consented. You could call the douche a douche but he didn't commit rape."

I didn't read to the end before I made my first comment, so I'm going to reply again to tell you that this is never, ever, EVER ok. And posting something like this, even as a hypothetical quotation, even with the qualifier that you KNOW it's probably not appropriate, even in the 101 board, in what is pretty much tantamount to a rape survivor group?

All I'm saying is I'm judging you pretty hard right now.

_________________
"THEY WILL TELL YOU NO, a thousand times no, until all the no's become meaningless. All your life they will tell you no, quite firmly and very quickly. AND YOU WILL TELL THEM YES."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Post-coital revocation of consent. *Triggers* Rape
PostPosted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 17, 2010 3:28 pm
Posts: 22
Folk, while I appreciate the effort, I'm not quite as hopeless as people seem to think. I do get that if you are given no reasonable option but to consent then that consent is meaningless. This covers much of the stuff that has been said. Including continuous demands, blackout level drunk, and any kind of threats. The problem that I'm having is specifically this part of the post that I quoted:
Spoiler: show
Quote:
The last few times I was raped were from very strong emotional and intellectual compulsion. At the time, I felt pretty convinced that I knew what decisions I was making. It wasn't until the "friendship" ended that I was able to look back and see that the guy had taken advantage of my emotional state. I don't think his desire was to rape me, but rather to get what he wanted by convincing me that I wanted the same thing.

Now, the last bolded bit is where my problem comes in. For me it says that he did manage to convince her that she wanted the same thing (the emotional and intellectual compulsion bit sounds similar reinforcing that in my mind's ear). If this was the case and she was in the emotional state she mentioned (which we can only presume was pretty bad) does it mean that he raped her? Analogous to way that a douchebag might financially swindle those in vulnerable emotional states. I guess that the question I'm asking is if an emotional state can ever be bad enough that it brings reduced capacity such that consent becomes meaningless (other things that do this: being a kid, being severely mentally ill, blackout drunkenness and so on) and thus that the action was rape even through enthusiastic consent.

Now, I might be helpful to explain why I'm asking. I felt like calling her out on calling this rape (because she is using this as an example in an argument that I consider bullshit). This set off by privilege alarm because I was invalidating the self labeled experiences of a person in a perfunctory manner. So before I lead the charge of the asshat brigade by attacking her or asking for clarification (saying that her explanation and self label isn't enough) I want to check that I'm not in the wrong (which is what I expect based on past experience).

_________________
harrietj wrote:
In fact, I am positively hermitical (fun note: this both means as pertaining to a hermit, and a spiced cookie. Om nom nom solitude!).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Post-coital revocation of consent. *Triggers* Rape
PostPosted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:57 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 3:18 am
Posts: 262
OK, here's one more bullet point for my list
If I consent to sex as a result of emotional abuse and manipulation, it's still rape.

There. Does that clear things up for you?

Edit to add: Look, in case you couldn't tell, this topic is getting me incredibly upset. I'll try to be, if not eloquent, then at least semi-coherent.
Reading her comment, it seems pretty clear to me that she was emotionally abused and manipulated by this friend. Emotional abuse is insidious. Most people don't believe you when you say you experienced it. You don't believe at the time that you're experiencing it. Especially not if the abuser is especially charismatic and manipulative.

Here's an example of mine:
Spoiler: show
When I was with my abuser, I abandoned my feminist philosophy and started reading websites like Humbled Females (note: if you visit the site, it's very tamed down compared to what it was before. Now it's basically just another BDSM female sub site. Back when I was a regular, it was all stuff like this - I know this is already under a spoiler, but I'll trigger warn that anyway. There were also discussions on what a woman should do with her vote, or whether she should vote at all. There were discussions on how to effectively punish a woman who committed adultery - one of the suggestions was chaining her to a wall in public and having men use her as a urinal.) I became the perfect submissive woman. I bought fully into the Natural Order philosophy, that Men were Men who needed to keep and master us lowly silly females, whose lot in life was to submit.

Under my new philosophy, I was physically available to him whenever he wanted me. I let him do a lot of stuff I otherwise would never, ever have consented to. I initiated sex a lot when I didn't want it, because I wanted him to think he was the most desirable Master on the planet. At the time, did I think it was consensual? Sure. Did I think I was freely participating? Sure. But when taken in the lens of me completely subverting my desires for him, in the lens of me molding myself into his model woman to keep him from screaming at me all the time, was I freely consenting? I don't think so. Even the supposedly consensual sex becomes suspect, non-consensual, rape. And, on top of that, this is the man who committed acts that I even considered sexual assault at the time, when I was trying to make myself fully available to him. Would you really tell me, after hearing all this, that you don't believe I was raped? That I should just forget the sullied, dirty, violated feeling I have about our supposedly consensual sex? Because I sure the fuck wouldn't. I'd say that every single time he touched me, he raped me.

_________________
"THEY WILL TELL YOU NO, a thousand times no, until all the no's become meaningless. All your life they will tell you no, quite firmly and very quickly. AND YOU WILL TELL THEM YES."


Last edited by Karalyn on Fri Aug 20, 2010 6:09 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group